2010 Kingston Cup

Division C Wall Chart

Player	Round 1	Round 2	Round 3	Round 4	Round 5	Round 6	Round 7	Round 8	Round 9	Round 10	Round 11	Round 12
1. Horowitz, Risa T	2-0 2nd vs. 12 1.0-0.0 +2 = +2	0-2 1st vs. 12 1.0-1.0 -2 = +0	0-2 2nd vs. 11 1.0-2.0 -2 = -2	2-0 1st vs. 11 2.0-2.0 +2 = +0	2-0 1st vs. 10 3.0-2.0 +2 = +2	0-2 2nd vs. 10 3.0-3.0 -2 = +0	2-0 2nd vs. 9 4.0-3.0 +2 = +2	0-2 1st vs. 9 4.0-4.0 -2 = +0	- 2nd vs. 8 - =	- 1st vs. 8 - =	- 1st vs. 7 - =	- 2nd vs. 7 - =	1. Horowitz, Risa
2. Shupak, Eli T	2-0 1st vs. 7 1.0-0.0 +2 = +2	0-2 2nd vs. 7 1.0-1.0 -2 = +0	2-0 1st vs. 12 2.0-1.0 +2 = +2	0-2 2nd vs. 12 2.0-2.0 -2 = +0	2-0 1st vs. 11 3.0-2.0 +2 = +2	2-0 2nd vs. 11 4.0-2.0 +2 = +4	0-2 1st vs. 10 4.0-3.0 -2 = +2	2-0 2nd vs. 10 5.0-3.0 +2 = +4	- 1st vs. 9 - =	- 2nd vs. 9 - =	- 2nd vs. 8 - =	- 1st vs. 8 - =	2. Shupak, Eli
3. Brown, Diane T	0-2 1st vs. 8 0.0-1.0 -2 = -2	2-0 2nd vs. 8 1.0-1.0 +2 = +0	0-2 2nd vs. 7 1.0-2.0 -2 = -2	2-0 1st vs. 7 2.0-2.0 +2 = +0	0-2 2nd vs. 12 2.0-3.0 -2 = -2	0-2 1st vs. 12 2.0-4.0 -2 = -4	2-0 1st vs. 11 3.0-4.0 +2 = -2	0-2 2nd vs. 11 3.0-5.0 -2 = -4	- 2nd vs. 10 - =	- 1st vs. 10 - =	- 2nd vs. 9 - =	- 1st vs. 9 - =	3. Brown, Diane
4. Janssen, Sharon T	2-0 2nd vs. 9 1.0-0.0 +2 = +2	0-2 1st vs. 9 1.0-1.0 -2 = +0	0-2 2nd vs. 8 1.0-2.0 -2 = -2	0-2 1st vs. 8 1.0-3.0 -2 = -4	0-2 1st vs. 7 1.0-4.0 -2 = -6	0-2 2nd vs. 7 1.0-5.0 -2 = -8	2-0 2nd vs. 12 2.0-5.0 +2 = -6	0-2 1st vs. 12 2.0-6.0 -2 = -8	- 2nd vs. 11 - =	- 1st vs. 11 - =	- 2nd vs. 10 - =	- 1st vs. 10 - =	4. Janssen, Sharon
5. Pressey, Carol T	0-2 2nd vs. 10 0.0-1.0 -2 = -2	0-2 1st vs. 10 0.0-2.0 -2 = -4	2-0 2nd vs. 9 1.0-2.0 +2 = -2	2-0 1st vs. 9 2.0-2.0 +2 = +0	2-0 1st vs. 8 3.0-2.0 +2 = +2	2-0 2nd vs. 8 4.0-2.0 +2 = +4	0-2 1st vs. 7 4.0-3.0 -2 = +2	0-2 2nd vs. 7 4.0-4.0 -2 = +0	- 1st vs. 12 - =	- 2nd vs. 12 - =	- 1st vs. 11 - =	- 2nd vs. 11 - =	5. Pressey, Carol
6. Gedney, Irene T	0-2 2nd vs. 11 0.0-1.0 -2 = -2	2-0 1st vs. 11 1.0-1.0 +2 = +0	0-2 2nd vs. 10 1.0-2.0 -2 = -2	0-2 1st vs. 10 1.0-3.0 -2 = -4	0-2 1st vs. 9 1.0-4.0 -2 = -6	0-2 2nd vs. 9 1.0-5.0 -2 = -8	0-2 2nd vs. 8 1.0-6.0 -2 = -10	0-2 1st vs. 8 1.0-7.0 -2 = -12	- 2nd vs. 7 - =	- 1st vs. 7 - =	- 2nd vs. 12 - =	- 1st vs. 12 - =	6. Gedney, Irene
7. Lovett, Norma M	0-2 2nd vs. 2 0.0-1.0 -2 = -2	2-0 1st vs. 2 1.0-1.0 +2 = +0	2-0 1st vs. 3 2.0-1.0 +2 = +2	0-2 2nd vs. 3 2.0-2.0 -2 = +0	2-0 2nd vs. 4 3.0-2.0 +2 = +2	2-0 1st vs. 4 4.0-2.0 +2 = +4	2-0 2nd vs. 5 5.0-2.0 +2 = +6	2-0 1st vs. 5 6.0-2.0 +2 = +8	- 1st vs. 6 - =	- 2nd vs. 6 - =	- 2nd vs. 1 - =	- 1st vs. 1 - =	7. Lovett, Norma
8. Henkelman, Emilie M	2-0 2nd vs. 3 1.0-0.0 +2 = +2	0-2 1st vs. 3 1.0-1.0 -2 = +0	2-0 1st vs. 4 2.0-1.0 +2 = +2	2-0 2nd vs. 4 3.0-1.0 +2 = +4	0-2 2nd vs. 5 3.0-2.0 -2 = +2	0-2 1st vs. 5 3.0-3.0 -2 = +0	2-0 1st vs. 6 4.0-3.0 +2 = +2	2-0 2nd vs. 6 5.0-3.0 +2 = +4	- 1st vs. 1 - =	- 2nd vs. 1 - =	- 1st vs. 2 - =	- 2nd vs. 2 - =	8. Henkelman, Emilie
9. Polson, Sylvia M	0-2 1st vs. 4 0.0-1.0 -2 = -2	2-0 2nd vs. 4 1.0-1.0 +2 = +0	0-2 1st vs. 5 1.0-2.0 -2 = -2	0-2 2nd vs. 5 1.0-3.0 -2 = -4	2-0 2nd vs. 6 2.0-3.0 +2 = -2	2-0 1st vs. 6 3.0-3.0 +2 = +0	0-2 1st vs. 1 3.0-4.0 -2 = -2	2-0 2nd vs. 1 4.0-4.0 +2 = +0	- 2nd vs. 2 - =	- 1st vs. 2 - =	- 1st vs. 3 - =	- 2nd vs. 3 - =	9. Polson, Sylvia
10. Apissoghomian, John M	2-0 1st vs. 5 1.0-0.0 +2 = +2	2-0 2nd vs. 5 2.0-0.0 +2 = +4	2-0 1st vs. 6 3.0-0.0 +2 = +6	2-0 2nd vs. 6 4.0-0.0 +2 = +8	0-2 2nd vs. 1 4.0-1.0 -2 = +6	2-0 1st vs. 1 5.0-1.0 +2 = +8	2-0 2nd vs. 2 6.0-1.0 +2 = +10	0-2 1st vs. 2 6.0-2.0 -2 = +8	- 1st vs. 3 - =	- 2nd vs. 3 - =	- 1st vs. 4 - =	- 2nd vs. 4 - =	10. Apissoghomian, John
11. Katz, Lorna M	2-0 1st vs. 6 1.0-0.0 +2 = +2	0-2 2nd vs. 6 1.0-1.0 -2 = +0	2-0 1st vs. 1 2.0-1.0 +2 = +2	0-2 2nd vs. 1 2.0-2.0 -2 = +0	0-2 2nd vs. 2 2.0-3.0 -2 = -2	0-2 1st vs. 2 2.0-4.0 -2 = -4	0-2 2nd vs. 3 2.0-5.0 -2 = -6	2-0 1st vs. 3 3.0-5.0 +2 = -4	- 1st vs. 4 - =	- 2nd vs. 4 - =	- 2nd vs. 5 - =	- 1st vs. 5 - =	11. Katz, Lorna
12. Ferguson, Sharon M	0-2 1st vs. 1 0.0-1.0 -2 = -2	2-0 2nd vs. 1 1.0-1.0 +2 = +0	0-2 2nd vs. 2 1.0-2.0 -2 = -2	2-0 1st vs. 2 2.0-2.0 +2 = +0	2-0 1st vs. 3 3.0-2.0 +2 = +2	2-0 2nd vs. 3 4.0-2.0 +2 = +4	0-2 1st vs. 4 4.0-3.0 -2 = +2	2-0 2nd vs. 4 5.0-3.0 +2 = +4	- 2nd vs. 5 - =	- 1st vs. 5 - =	- 1st vs. 6 - =	- 2nd vs. 6 - =	12. Ferguson, Sharon

This report was generated by tsh version 3.320. For more information about tsh, please contact John Chew.