2009 Kingston Cup

Division C Wall Chart

Player	Round 1	Round 2	Round 3	Round 4	Round 5	Round 6	Round 7	Round 8	Round 9	Round 10	Round 11	Round 12
1. Gibson, Geoff	0-2 2nd vs. 9 0.0-1.0 -2 = -2	2-0 1st vs. 10 1.0-1.0 +2 = +0	2-0 2nd vs. 11 2.0-1.0 +2 = +2	2-0 1st vs. 12 3.0-1.0 +2 = +4	2-0 2nd vs. 13 4.0-1.0 +2 = +6	0-2 1st vs. 14 4.0-2.0 -2 = +4	2-0 2nd vs. 8 5.0-2.0 +2 = +6	2-0 1st vs. 14 6.0-2.0 +2 = +8	2-0 2nd vs. 11 7.0-2.0 +2 = +10	0-2 1st vs. 9 7.0-3.0 -2 = +8	0-2 2nd vs. 10 7.0-4.0 -2 = +6	2-0 1st vs. 8 8.0-4.0 +2 = +8	1. Gibson, Geoff
2. Bathgate, Jillian	2-0 2nd vs. 10 1.0-0.0 +2 = +2	0-2 1st vs. 11 1.0-1.0 -2 = +0	2-0 2nd vs. 12 2.0-1.0 +2 = +2	2-0 1st vs. 13 3.0-1.0 +2 = +4	2-0 2nd vs. 14 4.0-1.0 +2 = +6	2-0 1st vs. 8 5.0-1.0 +2 = +8	0-2 2nd vs. 9 5.0-2.0 -2 = +6	0-2 1st vs. 12 5.0-3.0 -2 = +4	0-2 2nd vs. 13 5.0-4.0 -2 = +2	2-0 1st vs. 8 6.0-4.0 +2 = +4	0-2 2nd vs. 14 6.0-5.0 -2 = +2	2-0 1st vs. 10 7.0-5.0 +2 = +4	2. Bathgate, Jillian
3. Farini, Sharmaine	2-0 2nd vs. 11 1.0-0.0 +2 = +2	2-0 1st vs. 12 2.0-0.0 +2 = +4	2-0 2nd vs. 13 3.0-0.0 +2 = +6	2-0 1st vs. 14 4.0-0.0 +2 = +8	0-2 2nd vs. 8 4.0-1.0 -2 = +6	0-2 1st vs. 9 4.0-2.0 -2 = +4	2-0 2nd vs. 10 5.0-2.0 +2 = +6	2-0 1st vs. 8 6.0-2.0 +2 = +8	2-0 2nd vs. 12 7.0-2.0 +2 = +10	2-0 1st vs. 10 8.0-2.0 +2 = +12	2-0 2nd vs. 13 9.0-2.0 +2 = +14	2-0 1st vs. 9 10.0-2.0 +2 = +16	3. Farini, Sharmaine
4. Brown, Diane	0-2 2nd vs. 12 0.0-1.0 -2 = -2	2-0 1st vs. 13 1.0-1.0 +2 = +0	0-2 2nd vs. 14 1.0-2.0 -2 = -2	2-0 1st vs. 8 2.0-2.0 +2 = +0	2-0 2nd vs. 9 3.0-2.0 +2 = +2	0-2 1st vs. 10 3.0-3.0 -2 = +0	0-2 2nd vs. 11 3.0-4.0 -2 = -2	0-2 1st vs. 13 3.0-5.0 -2 = -4	0-2 2nd vs. 8 3.0-6.0 -2 = -6	2-0 1st vs. 14 4.0-6.0 +2 = -4	0-2 2nd vs. 9 4.0-7.0 -2 = -6	2-0 1st vs. 11 5.0-7.0 +2 = -4	4. Brown, Diane
5. Hunter, Pamela	2-0 2nd vs. 13 1.0-0.0 +2 = +2	2-0 1st vs. 14 2.0-0.0 +2 = +4	2-0 2nd vs. 8 3.0-0.0 +2 = +6	2-0 1st vs. 9 4.0-0.0 +2 = +8	2-0 2nd vs. 10 5.0-0.0 +2 = +10	2-0 1st vs. 11 6.0-0.0 +2 = +12	2-0 2nd vs. 12 7.0-0.0 +2 = +14	2-0 1st vs. 10 8.0-0.0 +2 = +16	2-0 2nd vs. 9 9.0-0.0 +2 = +18	2-0 1st vs. 11 10.0-0.0 +2 = +20	0-2 2nd vs. 12 10.0-1.0 -2 = +18	2-0 1st vs. 13 11.0-1.0 +2 = +20	5. Hunter, Pamela
6. Janssen, Sharon	2-0 2nd vs. 14 1.0-0.0 +2 = +2	2-0 1st vs. 8 2.0-0.0 +2 = +4	2-0 2nd vs. 9 3.0-0.0 +2 = +6	0-2 1st vs. 10 3.0-1.0 -2 = +4	2-0 2nd vs. 11 4.0-1.0 +2 = +6	0-2 1st vs. 12 4.0-2.0 -2 = +4	0-2 2nd vs. 13 4.0-3.0 -2 = +2	0-2 1st vs. 11 4.0-4.0 -2 = +0	0-2 2nd vs. 14 4.0-5.0 -2 = -2	0-2 1st vs. 13 4.0-6.0 -2 = -4	2-0 2nd vs. 8 5.0-6.0 +2 = -2	2-0 1st vs. 12 6.0-6.0 +2 = +0	6. Janssen, Sharon
7. Shupak, Eli	2-0 2nd vs. 8 1.0-0.0 +2 = +2	2-0 1st vs. 9 2.0-0.0 +2 = +4	0-2 2nd vs. 10 2.0-1.0 -2 = +2	2-0 1st vs. 11 3.0-1.0 +2 = +4	2-0 2nd vs. 12 4.0-1.0 +2 = +6	2-0 1st vs. 13 5.0-1.0 +2 = +8	2-0 2nd vs. 14 6.0-1.0 +2 = +10	2-0 1st vs. 9 7.0-1.0 +2 = +12	2-0 2nd vs. 10 8.0-1.0 +2 = +14	0-2 1st vs. 12 8.0-2.0 -2 = +12	2-0 2nd vs. 11 9.0-2.0 +2 = +14	2-0 1st vs. 14 10.0-2.0 +2 = +16	7. Shupak, Eli
8. Ramos, Lany	0-2 1st vs. 7 0.0-1.0 -2 = -2	0-2 2nd vs. 6 0.0-2.0 -2 = -4	0-2 1st vs. 5 0.0-3.0 -2 = -6	0-2 2nd vs. 4 0.0-4.0 -2 = -8	2-0 1st vs. 3 1.0-4.0 +2 = -6	0-2 2nd vs. 2 1.0-5.0 -2 = -8	0-2 1st vs. 1 1.0-6.0 -2 = -10	0-2 2nd vs. 3 1.0-7.0 -2 = -12	2-0 1st vs. 4 2.0-7.0 +2 = -10	0-2 2nd vs. 2 2.0-8.0 -2 = -12	0-2 1st vs. 6 2.0-9.0 -2 = -14	0-2 2nd vs. 1 2.0-10.0 -2 = -16	8. Ramos, Lany
9. Nabi, Ruth	2-0 1st vs. 1 1.0-0.0 +2 = +2	0-2 2nd vs. 7 1.0-1.0 -2 = +0	0-2 1st vs. 6 1.0-2.0 -2 = -2	0-2 2nd vs. 5 1.0-3.0 -2 = -4	0-2 1st vs. 4 1.0-4.0 -2 = -6	2-0 2nd vs. 3 2.0-4.0 +2 = -4	2-0 1st vs. 2 3.0-4.0 +2 = -2	0-2 2nd vs. 7 3.0-5.0 -2 = -4	0-2 1st vs. 5 3.0-6.0 -2 = -6	2-0 2nd vs. 1 4.0-6.0 +2 = -4	2-0 1st vs. 4 5.0-6.0 +2 = -2	0-2 2nd vs. 3 5.0-7.0 -2 = -4	9. Nabi, Ruth
10. Cromanty, Abie	0-2 1st vs. 2 0.0-1.0 -2 = -2	0-2 2nd vs. 1 0.0-2.0 -2 = -4	2-0 1st vs. 7 1.0-2.0 +2 = -2	2-0 2nd vs. 6 2.0-2.0 +2 = +0	0-2 1st vs. 5 2.0-3.0 -2 = -2	2-0 2nd vs. 4 3.0-3.0 +2 = +0	0-2 1st vs. 3 3.0-4.0 -2 = -2	0-2 2nd vs. 5 3.0-5.0 -2 = -4	0-2 1st vs. 7 3.0-6.0 -2 = -6	0-2 2nd vs. 3 3.0-7.0 -2 = -8	2-0 1st vs. 1 4.0-7.0 +2 = -6	0-2 2nd vs. 2 4.0-8.0 -2 = -8	10. Cromanty, Abie
11. Henkelman, Emilie	0-2 1st vs. 3 0.0-1.0 -2 = -2	2-0 2nd vs. 2 1.0-1.0 +2 = +0	0-2 1st vs. 1 1.0-2.0 -2 = -2	0-2 2nd vs. 7 1.0-3.0 -2 = -4	0-2 1st vs. 6 1.0-4.0 -2 = -6	0-2 2nd vs. 5 1.0-5.0 -2 = -8	2-0 1st vs. 4 2.0-5.0 +2 = -6	2-0 2nd vs. 6 3.0-5.0 +2 = -4	0-2 1st vs. 1 3.0-6.0 -2 = -6	0-2 2nd vs. 5 3.0-7.0 -2 = -8	0-2 1st vs. 7 3.0-8.0 -2 = -10	0-2 2nd vs. 4 3.0-9.0 -2 = -12	11. Henkelman, Emilie
12. Lovett, Norma	2-0 1st vs. 4 1.0-0.0 +2 = +2	0-2 2nd vs. 3 1.0-1.0 -2 = +0	0-2 1st vs. 2 1.0-2.0 -2 = -2	0-2 2nd vs. 1 1.0-3.0 -2 = -4	0-2 1st vs. 7 1.0-4.0 -2 = -6	2-0 2nd vs. 6 2.0-4.0 +2 = -4	0-2 1st vs. 5 2.0-5.0 -2 = -6	2-0 2nd vs. 2 3.0-5.0 +2 = -4	0-2 1st vs. 3 3.0-6.0 -2 = -6	2-0 2nd vs. 7 4.0-6.0 +2 = -4	2-0 1st vs. 5 5.0-6.0 +2 = -2	0-2 2nd vs. 6 5.0-7.0 -2 = -4	12. Lovett, Norma
13. Polson, Sylvia	0-2 1st vs. 5 0.0-1.0 -2 = -2	0-2 2nd vs. 4 0.0-2.0 -2 = -4	0-2 1st vs. 3 0.0-3.0 -2 = -6	0-2 2nd vs. 2 0.0-4.0 -2 = -8	0-2 1st vs. 1 0.0-5.0 -2 = -10	0-2 2nd vs. 7 0.0-6.0 -2 = -12	2-0 1st vs. 6 1.0-6.0 +2 = -10	2-0 2nd vs. 4 2.0-6.0 +2 = -8	2-0 1st vs. 2 3.0-6.0 +2 = -6	2-0 2nd vs. 6 4.0-6.0 +2 = -4	0-2 1st vs. 3 4.0-7.0 -2 = -6	0-2 2nd vs. 5 4.0-8.0 -2 = -8	13. Polson, Sylvia
14. Apissoghomian, John	0-2 1st vs. 6 0.0-1.0 -2 = -2	0-2 2nd vs. 5 0.0-2.0 -2 = -4	2-0 1st vs. 4 1.0-2.0 +2 = -2	0-2 2nd vs. 3 1.0-3.0 -2 = -4	0-2 1st vs. 2 1.0-4.0 -2 = -6	2-0 2nd vs. 1 2.0-4.0 +2 = -4	0-2 1st vs. 7 2.0-5.0 -2 = -6	0-2 2nd vs. 1 2.0-6.0 -2 = -8	2-0 1st vs. 6 3.0-6.0 +2 = -6	0-2 2nd vs. 4 3.0-7.0 -2 = -8	2-0 1st vs. 2 4.0-7.0 +2 = -6	0-2 2nd vs. 7 4.0-8.0 -2 = -8	14. Apissoghomian, John

This report was generated by tsh version 3.310. For more information about tsh, please contact John Chew.