2009 Kingston Cup

Division B Wall Chart

Player	Round 1	Round 2	Round 3	Round 4	Round 5	Round 6	Round 7	Round 8	Round 9	Round 10	Round 11	Round 12
1. Hergott, Deen	2-0 1st vs. 18 1.0-0.0 +2 = +2	0-2 2nd vs. 17 1.0-1.0 -2 = +0	0-2 1st vs. 16 1.0-2.0 -2 = -2	0-2 2nd vs. 15 1.0-3.0 -2 = -4	0-2 1st vs. 14 1.0-4.0 -2 = -6	2-0 2nd vs. 13 2.0-4.0 +2 = -4	2-0 1st vs. 12 3.0-4.0 +2 = -2	2-0 2nd vs. 11 4.0-4.0 +2 = +0	2-0 1st vs. 10 5.0-4.0 +2 = +2	0-2 2nd vs. 18 5.0-5.0 -2 = +0	2-0 1st vs. 16 6.0-5.0 +2 = +2	0-2 2nd vs. 11 6.0-6.0 -2 = +0	1. Hergott, Deen
2. Keras, Lydia	2-0 1st vs. 10 1.0-0.0 +2 = +2	0-2 2nd vs. 18 1.0-1.0 -2 = +0	0-2 1st vs. 17 1.0-2.0 -2 = -2	0-2 2nd vs. 16 1.0-3.0 -2 = -4	2-0 1st vs. 15 2.0-3.0 +2 = -2	0-2 2nd vs. 14 2.0-4.0 -2 = -4	2-0 1st vs. 13 3.0-4.0 +2 = -2	2-0 2nd vs. 12 4.0-4.0 +2 = +0	2-0 1st vs. 11 5.0-4.0 +2 = +2	0-2 2nd vs. 11 5.0-5.0 -2 = +0	2-0 1st vs. 17 6.0-5.0 +2 = +2	2-0 2nd vs. 18 7.0-5.0 +2 = +4	2. Keras, Lydia
3. Karanofsky, Sary	2-0 1st vs. 11 1.0-0.0 +2 = +2	2-0 2nd vs. 10 2.0-0.0 +2 = +4	2-0 1st vs. 18 3.0-0.0 +2 = +6	0-2 2nd vs. 17 3.0-1.0 -2 = +4	2-0 1st vs. 16 4.0-1.0 +2 = +6	2-0 2nd vs. 15 5.0-1.0 +2 = +8	0-2 1st vs. 14 5.0-2.0 -2 = +6	0-2 2nd vs. 13 5.0-3.0 -2 = +4	0-2 1st vs. 12 5.0-4.0 -2 = +2	2-0 2nd vs. 13 6.0-4.0 +2 = +4	2-0 1st vs. 18 7.0-4.0 +2 = +6	0-2 2nd vs. 14 7.0-5.0 -2 = +4	3. Karanofsky, Sary
4. Fall, Nicholas	2-0 1st vs. 12 1.0-0.0 +2 = +2	2-0 2nd vs. 11 2.0-0.0 +2 = +4	2-0 1st vs. 10 3.0-0.0 +2 = +6	2-0 2nd vs. 18 4.0-0.0 +2 = +8	2-0 1st vs. 17 5.0-0.0 +2 = +10	2-0 2nd vs. 16 6.0-0.0 +2 = +12	2-0 1st vs. 15 7.0-0.0 +2 = +14	2-0 2nd vs. 14 8.0-0.0 +2 = +16	2-0 1st vs. 13 9.0-0.0 +2 = +18	0-2 2nd vs. 14 9.0-1.0 -2 = +16	0-2 1st vs. 13 9.0-2.0 -2 = +14	0-2 2nd vs. 16 9.0-3.0 -2 = +12	4. Fall, Nicholas
5. Rackham, Anita	0-2 1st vs. 13 0.0-1.0 -2 = -2	2-0 2nd vs. 12 1.0-1.0 +2 = +0	2-0 1st vs. 11 2.0-1.0 +2 = +2	2-0 2nd vs. 10 3.0-1.0 +2 = +4	2-0 1st vs. 18 4.0-1.0 +2 = +6	0-2 2nd vs. 17 4.0-2.0 -2 = +4	2-0 1st vs. 16 5.0-2.0 +2 = +6	0-2 2nd vs. 15 5.0-3.0 -2 = +4	2-0 1st vs. 14 6.0-3.0 +2 = +6	0-2 2nd vs. 16 6.0-4.0 -2 = +4	2-0 1st vs. 14 7.0-4.0 +2 = +6	2-0 2nd vs. 13 8.0-4.0 +2 = +8	5. Rackham, Anita
6. Kirsch, Richard	0-2 1st vs. 14 0.0-1.0 -2 = -2	0-2 2nd vs. 13 0.0-2.0 -2 = -4	2-0 1st vs. 12 1.0-2.0 +2 = -2	2-0 2nd vs. 11 2.0-2.0 +2 = +0	2-0 1st vs. 10 3.0-2.0 +2 = +2	0-2 2nd vs. 18 3.0-3.0 -2 = +0	0-2 1st vs. 17 3.0-4.0 -2 = -2	2-0 2nd vs. 16 4.0-4.0 +2 = +0	2-0 1st vs. 15 5.0-4.0 +2 = +2	0-2 2nd vs. 17 5.0-5.0 -2 = +0	0-2 1st vs. 12 5.0-6.0 -2 = -2	0-2 2nd vs. 15 5.0-7.0 -2 = -4	6. Kirsch, Richard
7. Bultz, Barbara	2-0 1st vs. 15 1.0-0.0 +2 = +2	0-2 2nd vs. 14 1.0-1.0 -2 = +0	2-0 1st vs. 13 2.0-1.0 +2 = +2	2-0 2nd vs. 12 3.0-1.0 +2 = +4	0-2 1st vs. 11 3.0-2.0 -2 = +2	0-2 2nd vs. 10 3.0-3.0 -2 = +0	2-0 1st vs. 18 4.0-3.0 +2 = +2	2-0 2nd vs. 17 5.0-3.0 +2 = +4	0-2 1st vs. 16 5.0-4.0 -2 = +2	2-0 2nd vs. 15 6.0-4.0 +2 = +4	2-0 1st vs. 10 7.0-4.0 +2 = +6	0-2 2nd vs. 17 7.0-5.0 -2 = +4	7. Bultz, Barbara
8. Gitelman, Akiva	0-2 1st vs. 16 0.0-1.0 -2 = -2	0-2 2nd vs. 15 0.0-2.0 -2 = -4	0-2 1st vs. 14 0.0-3.0 -2 = -6	0-2 2nd vs. 13 0.0-4.0 -2 = -8	0-2 1st vs. 12 0.0-5.0 -2 = -10	0-2 2nd vs. 11 0.0-6.0 -2 = -12	0-2 1st vs. 10 0.0-7.0 -2 = -14	0-2 2nd vs. 18 0.0-8.0 -2 = -16	2-0 1st vs. 17 1.0-8.0 +2 = -14	0-2 2nd vs. 12 1.0-9.0 -2 = -16	0-2 1st vs. 11 1.0-10.0 -2 = -18	0-2 2nd vs. 10 1.0-11.0 -2 = -20	8. Gitelman, Akiva
9. Barclay, Wayne	2-0 1st vs. 17 1.0-0.0 +2 = +2	0-2 2nd vs. 16 1.0-1.0 -2 = +0	2-0 1st vs. 15 2.0-1.0 +2 = +2	2-0 2nd vs. 14 3.0-1.0 +2 = +4	0-2 1st vs. 13 3.0-2.0 -2 = +2	0-2 2nd vs. 12 3.0-3.0 -2 = +0	2-0 1st vs. 11 4.0-3.0 +2 = +2	2-0 2nd vs. 10 5.0-3.0 +2 = +4	0-2 1st vs. 18 5.0-4.0 -2 = +2	2-0 2nd vs. 10 6.0-4.0 +2 = +4	2-0 1st vs. 15 7.0-4.0 +2 = +6	2-0 2nd vs. 12 8.0-4.0 +2 = +8	9. Barclay, Wayne
10. Wise, Lynda	0-2 2nd vs. 2 0.0-1.0 -2 = -2	0-2 1st vs. 3 0.0-2.0 -2 = -4	0-2 2nd vs. 4 0.0-3.0 -2 = -6	0-2 1st vs. 5 0.0-4.0 -2 = -8	0-2 2nd vs. 6 0.0-5.0 -2 = -10	2-0 1st vs. 7 1.0-5.0 +2 = -8	2-0 2nd vs. 8 2.0-5.0 +2 = -6	0-2 1st vs. 9 2.0-6.0 -2 = -8	0-2 2nd vs. 1 2.0-7.0 -2 = -10	0-2 1st vs. 9 2.0-8.0 -2 = -12	0-2 2nd vs. 7 2.0-9.0 -2 = -14	2-0 1st vs. 8 3.0-9.0 +2 = -12	10. Wise, Lynda
11. Rodriguez, Alex	0-2 2nd vs. 3 0.0-1.0 -2 = -2	0-2 1st vs. 4 0.0-2.0 -2 = -4	0-2 2nd vs. 5 0.0-3.0 -2 = -6	0-2 1st vs. 6 0.0-4.0 -2 = -8	2-0 2nd vs. 7 1.0-4.0 +2 = -6	2-0 1st vs. 8 2.0-4.0 +2 = -4	0-2 2nd vs. 9 2.0-5.0 -2 = -6	0-2 1st vs. 1 2.0-6.0 -2 = -8	0-2 2nd vs. 2 2.0-7.0 -2 = -10	2-0 1st vs. 2 3.0-7.0 +2 = -8	2-0 2nd vs. 8 4.0-7.0 +2 = -6	2-0 1st vs. 1 5.0-7.0 +2 = -4	11. Rodriguez, Alex
12. Sealy, Trevor	0-2 2nd vs. 4 0.0-1.0 -2 = -2	0-2 1st vs. 5 0.0-2.0 -2 = -4	0-2 2nd vs. 6 0.0-3.0 -2 = -6	0-2 1st vs. 7 0.0-4.0 -2 = -8	2-0 2nd vs. 8 1.0-4.0 +2 = -6	2-0 1st vs. 9 2.0-4.0 +2 = -4	0-2 2nd vs. 1 2.0-5.0 -2 = -6	0-2 1st vs. 2 2.0-6.0 -2 = -8	2-0 2nd vs. 3 3.0-6.0 +2 = -6	2-0 1st vs. 8 4.0-6.0 +2 = -4	2-0 2nd vs. 6 5.0-6.0 +2 = -2	0-2 1st vs. 9 5.0-7.0 -2 = -4	12. Sealy, Trevor
13. Miransky, Anna	2-0 2nd vs. 5 1.0-0.0 +2 = +2	2-0 1st vs. 6 2.0-0.0 +2 = +4	0-2 2nd vs. 7 2.0-1.0 -2 = +2	2-0 1st vs. 8 3.0-1.0 +2 = +4	2-0 2nd vs. 9 4.0-1.0 +2 = +6	0-2 1st vs. 1 4.0-2.0 -2 = +4	0-2 2nd vs. 2 4.0-3.0 -2 = +2	2-0 1st vs. 3 5.0-3.0 +2 = +4	0-2 2nd vs. 4 5.0-4.0 -2 = +2	0-2 1st vs. 3 5.0-5.0 -2 = +0	2-0 2nd vs. 4 6.0-5.0 +2 = +2	0-2 1st vs. 5 6.0-6.0 -2 = +0	13. Miransky, Anna
14. Bigall, Vera	2-0 2nd vs. 6 1.0-0.0 +2 = +2	2-0 1st vs. 7 2.0-0.0 +2 = +4	2-0 2nd vs. 8 3.0-0.0 +2 = +6	0-2 1st vs. 9 3.0-1.0 -2 = +4	2-0 2nd vs. 1 4.0-1.0 +2 = +6	2-0 1st vs. 2 5.0-1.0 +2 = +8	2-0 2nd vs. 3 6.0-1.0 +2 = +10	0-2 1st vs. 4 6.0-2.0 -2 = +8	0-2 2nd vs. 5 6.0-3.0 -2 = +6	2-0 1st vs. 4 7.0-3.0 +2 = +8	0-2 2nd vs. 5 7.0-4.0 -2 = +6	2-0 1st vs. 3 8.0-4.0 +2 = +8	14. Bigall, Vera
15. Cullman, Roger	0-2 2nd vs. 7 0.0-1.0 -2 = -2	2-0 1st vs. 8 1.0-1.0 +2 = +0	0-2 2nd vs. 9 1.0-2.0 -2 = -2	2-0 1st vs. 1 2.0-2.0 +2 = +0	0-2 2nd vs. 2 2.0-3.0 -2 = -2	0-2 1st vs. 3 2.0-4.0 -2 = -4	0-2 2nd vs. 4 2.0-5.0 -2 = -6	2-0 1st vs. 5 3.0-5.0 +2 = -4	0-2 2nd vs. 6 3.0-6.0 -2 = -6	0-2 1st vs. 7 3.0-7.0 -2 = -8	0-2 2nd vs. 9 3.0-8.0 -2 = -10	2-0 1st vs. 6 4.0-8.0 +2 = -8	15. Cullman, Roger
16. Palazzo, Mad	2-0 2nd vs. 8 1.0-0.0 +2 = +2	2-0 1st vs. 9 2.0-0.0 +2 = +4	2-0 2nd vs. 1 3.0-0.0 +2 = +6	2-0 1st vs. 2 4.0-0.0 +2 = +8	0-2 2nd vs. 3 4.0-1.0 -2 = +6	0-2 1st vs. 4 4.0-2.0 -2 = +4	0-2 2nd vs. 5 4.0-3.0 -2 = +2	0-2 1st vs. 6 4.0-4.0 -2 = +0	2-0 2nd vs. 7 5.0-4.0 +2 = +2	2-0 1st vs. 5 6.0-4.0 +2 = +4	0-2 2nd vs. 1 6.0-5.0 -2 = +2	2-0 1st vs. 4 7.0-5.0 +2 = +4	16. Palazzo, Mad
17. Megannety, Brenda	0-2 2nd vs. 9 0.0-1.0 -2 = -2	2-0 1st vs. 1 1.0-1.0 +2 = +0	2-0 2nd vs. 2 2.0-1.0 +2 = +2	2-0 1st vs. 3 3.0-1.0 +2 = +4	0-2 2nd vs. 4 3.0-2.0 -2 = +2	2-0 1st vs. 5 4.0-2.0 +2 = +4	2-0 2nd vs. 6 5.0-2.0 +2 = +6	0-2 1st vs. 7 5.0-3.0 -2 = +4	0-2 2nd vs. 8 5.0-4.0 -2 = +2	2-0 1st vs. 6 6.0-4.0 +2 = +4	0-2 2nd vs. 2 6.0-5.0 -2 = +2	2-0 1st vs. 7 7.0-5.0 +2 = +4	17. Megannety, Brenda
18. Kessler, Lisa	0-2 2nd vs. 1 0.0-1.0 -2 = -2	2-0 1st vs. 2 1.0-1.0 +2 = +0	0-2 2nd vs. 3 1.0-2.0 -2 = -2	0-2 1st vs. 4 1.0-3.0 -2 = -4	0-2 2nd vs. 5 1.0-4.0 -2 = -6	2-0 1st vs. 6 2.0-4.0 +2 = -4	0-2 2nd vs. 7 2.0-5.0 -2 = -6	2-0 1st vs. 8 3.0-5.0 +2 = -4	2-0 2nd vs. 9 4.0-5.0 +2 = -2	2-0 1st vs. 1 5.0-5.0 +2 = +0	0-2 2nd vs. 3 5.0-6.0 -2 = -2	0-2 1st vs. 2 5.0-7.0 -2 = -4	18. Kessler, Lisa

This report was generated by tsh version 3.310. For more information about tsh, please contact John Chew.